Arthur van Eerden
Compliance Monitoring Manager at ADAC HEMS Academy, Hangelaar (NRW), Germany.
Comments
-
Great Idea from Bruno. Could we also have a limit on who can change/add definitions and abbreviations? In this way you can prevent editors from changing definitions on their own accord...and create...
-
Good idea to develop the possibility of a four eyes check on compliance connections, allowing you to check the work of a regulation owner and sign-off on it. Or mark it in WM to be audited (which w...
-
Fully agree with Natalie this is a very useful option. Could we have an automatic e mail reminder sent the moment the document is published? I use the option where i publish documents in advance of...
-
I like your suggestions Bruno, and indeed it is difficult as an editor to keep track of all Review comments in the various stages of the workflow. The system should help (more) to track and sort al...
-
In my organisation only admins can publish documents, for a last check to ensure all steps of the process have been followed.
-
Hi Lajos, no, i have not. Would that not make the problem worse?
-
Fully agree with Lajos; i encountered Reviewers Reviewing documents they are not supposed to Review. I.e. anyone with Reviewers rights can see / Review all documents that have the Review status. Cr...
-
When clicking on the link in the e mail notifying me of a change request, the system opens the Reader and shows the document. Why not directly to the editor function so the change can be done immed...
-
I agree with Natalie; Readers going through the effort to submit a change requested should be kept abreast on the progress. Its OK not to sent a confirmation after submitting BUT Readers should be ...
-
In my current company we do not use this functionality and moved to all English documentation. In my previous company we did try to use it, but found that in English you can say more with fewer wor...